brianletort.ai
← Library

Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

Verified evidenceCreator to judge

Real-time ML listening and dispatcher cardiac-arrest alerts

A live emergency-call alert may not improve dispatcher recognition despite higher standalone model sensitivity.

Engineering design · Copenhagen, Denmark

Collections: Negative results

An editorial scene for Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services contrasts listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol. with listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest. in the real-time ml listening and dispatcher cardiac-arrest alerts workflow.

Executive brief

The operating-model shift, in one view.

A better classifier is not a better operating model. The alert's low precision and insertion into a time-critical conversation prevented technical sensitivity from becoming human performance.

AI value · Dispatcher recognition of confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Verified

93.1% with the alert, P=.15; no statistically significant improvement

High-quality randomized negative result. The model alone was more sensitive but materially less specific and had lower positive predictive value than dispatchers.

Before

Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol. → Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.

After

Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest. → Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.

Human boundary

The model alerts; the dispatcher decides whether to declare suspected OHCA and start CPR coaching and dispatch.

Why it matters

A live emergency-call alert may not improve dispatcher recognition despite higher standalone model sensitivity.

How the work changed

Before

How the work ran before the change.

  1. Step 1 of 2

    Medical dispatcher

    Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol.

    ControlStandard dispatch protocol

  2. Step 2 of 2

    Dispatcher

    Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.

    ControlHuman clinical judgment

What changed

A live emergency-call alert may not improve dispatcher recognition despite higher standalone model sensitivity.

Decision rightHuman moves from creator to judge

After

How the same work runs now.

  1. Step 1 of 2

    Speech-recognition ML model

    Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest.

    ControlModel alert

  2. Step 2 of 2

    Medical dispatcher

    Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.

    ControlDispatcher retains all response rights

Process model built from the published workflow evidence for Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services. Every step, actor, and control appears in full below.
Every step, actor, and control

Exception path

Dispatchers ignore false alerts and follow standard protocols; no response is automatically triggered by the model.

Work removed

  • None demonstrated; the alert added information but did not significantly improve the human outcome

Decision authority

The model alerts; the dispatcher decides whether to declare suspected OHCA and start CPR coaching and dispatch.

Before

  1. 01

    Medical dispatcher

    Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol.

    Control: Standard dispatch protocol

  2. 02

    Dispatcher

    Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.

    Control: Human clinical judgment

After

  1. 01

    Speech-recognition ML model

    Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest.

    Control: Model alert

  2. 02

    Medical dispatcher

    Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.

    Control: Dispatcher retains all response rights

Work that left the path

  • None demonstrated; the alert added information but did not significantly improve the human outcome

Human role before

Dispatchers recognized cardiac arrest using the caller conversation and protocol.

Human role after

Dispatchers receive an additional alert but remain responsible for recognition and response.

AI roleSpeech-recognition and classification model that identifies suspected cardiac arrest during live calls.

Outcomes

Dispatcher recognition of confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Verified

90.5% with standard protocol and no model alert93.1% with the alert, P=.15; no statistically significant improvement

2018-09-01 through 2019-12-31 · 169,049 calls screened; 5,242 suspected calls randomized; 654 confirmed OHCA cases

High-quality randomized negative result. The model alone was more sensitive but materially less specific and had lower positive predictive value than dispatchers.

What leaders can reuse

Anti-pattern

Selecting on model sensitivity while ignoring alert precision and operator response.

Questions

  1. 01Does the alert improve the human decision?
  2. 02What false-positive rate is tolerable in a time-critical queue?

Portability conditions

  • High alert precision
  • Human-factors testing
  • No automatic adverse action

Reputation risk

low

Evidence and authority

What the public record supports.

Current · updated

1 peer reviewed; publication outcomes are verified.

Bundle 1.0.0 · reviewed 2026-08-23 · stable ID bfb4dcb5dde322ef

Related transformations

More in Engineering design

Sources

Read the evidence, freshness, caveat, and version policy.