A better classifier is not a better operating model. The alert's low precision and insertion into a time-critical conversation prevented technical sensitivity from becoming human performance.
AI value · Dispatcher recognition of confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Verified
93.1% with the alert, P=.15; no statistically significant improvement
High-quality randomized negative result. The model alone was more sensitive but materially less specific and had lower positive predictive value than dispatchers.
Before
Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol. → Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.
After
Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest. → Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.
Human boundary
The model alerts; the dispatcher decides whether to declare suspected OHCA and start CPR coaching and dispatch.
Why it matters
A live emergency-call alert may not improve dispatcher recognition despite higher standalone model sensitivity.
How the work changed
Before
How the work ran before the change.
Step 1 of 2
Medical dispatcher
Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol.
ControlStandard dispatch protocol
Step 2 of 2
Dispatcher
Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.
ControlHuman clinical judgment
What changed
A live emergency-call alert may not improve dispatcher recognition despite higher standalone model sensitivity.
Decision rightHuman moves from creator to judge
After
How the same work runs now.
Step 1 of 2
Speech-recognition ML model
Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest.
ControlModel alert
Step 2 of 2
Medical dispatcher
Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.
ControlDispatcher retains all response rights
Process model built from the published workflow evidence for Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services. Every step, actor, and control appears in full below.Every step, actor, and control
Exception path
Dispatchers ignore false alerts and follow standard protocols; no response is automatically triggered by the model.
Decision authority
The model alerts; the dispatcher decides whether to declare suspected OHCA and start CPR coaching and dispatch.
Before
#
Actor
Action
Control
01
Medical dispatcher
Listen to the caller, recognize suspected cardiac arrest, and initiate the protocol.
Standard dispatch protocol
02
Dispatcher
Coach CPR and dispatch resources when cardiac arrest is recognized.
Human clinical judgment
After
#
Actor
Action
Control
01
Speech-recognition ML model
Listens to ongoing calls and flags suspected cardiac arrest.
Model alert
02
Medical dispatcher
Considers the alert and decides whether to recognize OHCA and initiate the standard response.
Dispatcher retains all response rights
Work that left the path
None demonstrated; the alert added information but did not significantly improve the human outcome
Human role before
Dispatchers recognized cardiac arrest using the caller conversation and protocol.
Human role after
Dispatchers receive an additional alert but remain responsible for recognition and response.
AI role
Speech-recognition and classification model that identifies suspected cardiac arrest during live calls.
Outcomes
Dispatcher recognition of confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Verified
90.5% with standard protocol and no model alert→93.1% with the alert, P=.15; no statistically significant improvement
High-quality randomized negative result. The model alone was more sensitive but materially less specific and had lower positive predictive value than dispatchers.
What leaders can reuse
Anti-pattern
Selecting on model sensitivity while ignoring alert precision and operator response.
Questions
01Does the alert improve the human decision?
02What false-positive rate is tolerable in a time-critical queue?
Portability conditions
High alert precision
Human-factors testing
No automatic adverse action
Reputation risk
low
Evidence and authority
What the public record supports.
Current · updated
1 peer reviewed; publication outcomes are verified.
Bundle 1.0.0 · reviewed 2026-09-06 · stable ID bfb4dcb5dde322ef